He fought his first battle on the Scottish Highlands in 1536. He will fight his greatest battle on the streets of New York City in 1986. His name is Connor MacLeod. He is immortal.
Highlander was savaged by mainstream critics on release but has built a devoted following over decades, and the gap between those two verdicts is the real story. The film's core tension — whether its cheesy excess is a fatal flaw or the whole point — remains genuinely unresolved, with even sympathetic reviewers splitting over whether the muddled plotting and ham acting are forgiven by the sheer kinetic bravado of Mulcahy's direction and the Queen soundtrack.
“What the film loses through ham acting, weak narrative, and pompous macho posturing it more than compensates with in sheer fiery bravado, pace, and larger than life action.”
Matt Ford·BBC
“The dialogue and performances don't quite match many of the film's concepts, though. The tone seems somewhat uneven as if Highlander is unsure if it wants to be seen as a straight adventure epic or if it's a campy action flick.”
Adam Tyner·DVD Talk
“interesting notion made silly and boring”
Leonard Maltin·Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide
“What the film does have going for it is stylish direction, a breathless pace and some exquisite camerawork. The performances aren't bad either, especially Brown and Connery, who are so far over the top they're practically in the next trench.”
Alex Stewart·White Dwarf
“Lambert, Mulcahy, and all of the people involved with this film have poured all of their talent into its making, and it shows. There are no flaws in the special effects, the photography, the rapid transitions, etc. It is a flowing masterpiece with but one problem - after it was finished, some heavy-handed, second guessing editing was added, which bruised, but did not break, a number of scenes.”
John Nubbin·Different Worlds
Action, Adventure, Fantasy
He fought his first battle on the Scottish Highlands in 1536. He will fight his greatest battle on the streets of New York City in 1986. His name is Connor MacLeod. He is immortal.
Highlander was savaged by mainstream critics on release but has built a devoted following over decades, and the gap between those two verdicts is the real story. The film's core tension — whether its cheesy excess is a fatal flaw or the whole point — remains genuinely unresolved, with even sympathetic reviewers splitting over whether the muddled plotting and ham acting are forgiven by the sheer kinetic bravado of Mulcahy's direction and the Queen soundtrack.
“What the film loses through ham acting, weak narrative, and pompous macho posturing it more than compensates with in sheer fiery bravado, pace, and larger than life action.”
Matt Ford·BBC
“The dialogue and performances don't quite match many of the film's concepts, though. The tone seems somewhat uneven as if Highlander is unsure if it wants to be seen as a straight adventure epic or if it's a campy action flick.”
Adam Tyner·DVD Talk
“interesting notion made silly and boring”
Leonard Maltin·Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide
“What the film does have going for it is stylish direction, a breathless pace and some exquisite camerawork. The performances aren't bad either, especially Brown and Connery, who are so far over the top they're practically in the next trench.”
Alex Stewart·White Dwarf
“Lambert, Mulcahy, and all of the people involved with this film have poured all of their talent into its making, and it shows. There are no flaws in the special effects, the photography, the rapid transitions, etc. It is a flowing masterpiece with but one problem - after it was finished, some heavy-handed, second guessing editing was added, which bruised, but did not break, a number of scenes.”
John Nubbin·Different Worlds
Action, Adventure, Fantasy