Charlie Croker pulled off the crime of a lifetime. The one thing that he didn't plan on was being double-crossed. Along with a drop-dead gorgeous safecracker, Croker and his team take off to re-steal the loot and end up in a pulse-pounding, pedal-to-the-metal chase that careens up, down, above and below the streets of Los Angeles.
A breezy, generally well-liked heist film that most critics found competent and entertaining without demanding much from the audience — the Mini Cooper chase sequences drew near-universal enthusiasm, but the Los Angeles finale divided opinion over whether its cleverness tipped into absurdity. A handful of dissenters found the whole enterprise lazy and derivative, arguing that remaking an already thin 1969 film produced nothing worth the effort.
“two hours of mindless escapism on a relatively skilled professional level”
Roger Ebert·Chicago Sun-Times
“a lazy and in-name-only remake”
Mike Clark·USA Today
“a tricked-out remake of a heist flick that was already flat and formulaic in 1969”
Peter Travers·Rolling Stone
“revenge plot adds wallop lacking in the original”
Stella Papamichael·BBC
“plotted and executed with invention and humor”
Mick LaSalle·San Francisco Chronicle
Action, Crime
Charlie Croker pulled off the crime of a lifetime. The one thing that he didn't plan on was being double-crossed. Along with a drop-dead gorgeous safecracker, Croker and his team take off to re-steal the loot and end up in a pulse-pounding, pedal-to-the-metal chase that careens up, down, above and below the streets of Los Angeles.
A breezy, generally well-liked heist film that most critics found competent and entertaining without demanding much from the audience — the Mini Cooper chase sequences drew near-universal enthusiasm, but the Los Angeles finale divided opinion over whether its cleverness tipped into absurdity. A handful of dissenters found the whole enterprise lazy and derivative, arguing that remaking an already thin 1969 film produced nothing worth the effort.
“two hours of mindless escapism on a relatively skilled professional level”
Roger Ebert·Chicago Sun-Times
“a lazy and in-name-only remake”
Mike Clark·USA Today
“a tricked-out remake of a heist flick that was already flat and formulaic in 1969”
Peter Travers·Rolling Stone
“revenge plot adds wallop lacking in the original”
Stella Papamichael·BBC
“plotted and executed with invention and humor”
Mick LaSalle·San Francisco Chronicle
Action, Crime